Print Page  Close Window

SEC Filings

S-1/A
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. /MO/ filed this Form S-1/A on 11/04/1999
Entire Document
 
<PAGE>   35
 
     - rules for franchise renewals and transfers; and
 
     - other requirements covering a variety of operational areas such as equal
       employment opportunity, technical standards and customer service
       requirements.
 
     Additionally, many aspects of these regulations are currently the subject
of judicial proceedings and administrative or legislative proposals. There are
also ongoing efforts to amend or expand the state and local regulation of some
of our cable systems, which may compound the regulatory risks we already face.
We cannot predict whether in response to these efforts any of the states or
localities in which we now operate will expand regulation of our cable systems
in the future or how they will do so.
 
WE MAY BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO OUR NETWORKS TO OTHER INTERNET SERVICE
PROVIDERS. THIS COULD SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASE OUR COMPETITION AND ADVERSELY
AFFECT THE UPGRADE OF OUR SYSTEMS OR OUR ABILITY TO PROVIDE NEW PRODUCTS AND
SERVICES.
 
     There are proposals before the United States Congress and the Federal
Communications Commission to require all cable operators to make a portion of
their cable systems' bandwidth available to other Internet service providers,
such as telephone companies. Certain local franchising authorities are
considering or have already approved such "open access" requirements. Recently,
a number of companies, including telephone companies and Internet service
providers, have requested local authorities and the Federal Communications
Commission to require cable operators to provide access to cable's broadband
infrastructure, which allows cable to deliver a multitude of channels and/or
services, so that these companies may deliver Internet services directly to
customers over cable facilities. For example, Broward County, Florida granted
open access to an Internet service provider as a condition to a cable operator's
transfer of its franchise for cable service. The cable operator has commenced
legal action at the federal district court level. A federal district court in
Portland, Oregon has also upheld the legality of an open access requirement.
 
     We believe that allocating a portion of our bandwidth capacity to other
Internet service providers:
 
     - would impair our ability to use our bandwidth in ways that would generate
       maximum revenues;
 
     - would strengthen our Internet service provider competitors; and
 
     - may cause us to decide not to upgrade our systems which would prevent us
       from introducing our planned new products and services.
 
     In addition, we cannot assure you that if we were required to provide
access in this manner, it would not have a significant adverse impact on our
profitability. This could impact us in many ways, including by:
 
     - increasing competition;
 
     - increasing the expenses we incur to maintain our systems; and/or
 
     - increasing the expense of upgrading and/or expanding our systems.
 
                                       32