Print Page  Close Window

SEC Filings

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. /MO/ filed this Form S-1 on 07/28/1999
Entire Document
<PAGE>   99
Federal Communications Commission interconnection regulations. Although these
regulations should enable new telecommunications entrants to reach viable
interconnection agreements with incumbent carriers, many issues, including
whether the Federal Communications Commission ultimately can mandate that
incumbent carriers make available specific network elements, remains subject to
further Federal Communications Commission review. Aggressive regulation by the
Federal Communications Commission in this area, if upheld by the courts, would
make it easier for us to provide telecommunications service.
     INTERNET SERVICE.  Although there is at present no significant federal
regulation of cable system delivery of Internet services, and the Federal
Communications Commission recently issued a report to Congress finding no
immediate need to impose such regulation, this situation may change as cable
systems expand their broadband delivery of Internet services. In particular,
proposals have been advanced at the Federal Communications Commission and
Congress that would require cable operators to provide access to unaffiliated
Internet service providers and online service providers. Certain Internet
service providers also are attempting to use existing commercial leased access
provisions to gain access to cable system delivery. A petition on this issue is
now pending before the Federal Communications Commission. Finally, some local
franchising authorities are considering the imposition of mandatory Internet
access requirements as part of cable franchise renewals or transfers. A federal
district court in Portland, Oregon recently upheld the legal ability of local
franchising authority to impose such conditions, but an appeal has been filed.
Other local authorities have imposed or may impose mandatory Internet access
requirements on cable operators. These developments could, if they become
widespread, burden the capacity of cable systems and complicate our own plans
for providing Internet service.
telephone companies to compete directly with cable operators by repealing the
historic telephone company/cable cross-ownership ban. Local exchange carriers,
including the regional telephone companies, can now compete with cable operators
both inside and outside their telephone service areas with certain regulatory
safeguards. Because of their resources, local exchange carriers could be
formidable competitors to traditional cable operators, and certain local
exchange carriers have begun offering cable service.
     Various local exchange carriers currently are seeking to provide video
programming services within their telephone service areas through a variety of
distribution methods, including both the deployment of broadband wire facilities
and the use of wireless transmission.
     Under the 1996 Telecom Act, local exchange carriers or any other cable
competitor providing video programming to subscribers through broadband wire
should be regulated as a traditional cable operator, subject to local
franchising and federal regulatory requirements, unless the local exchange
carrier or other cable competitor elects to deploy its broadband plant as an
open video system. To qualify for favorable open video system status, the
competitor must reserve two-thirds of the system's activated channels for
unaffiliated entities. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently reversed
certain of the Federal Communications Commission's open video system rules,
including its preemption of local franchising. That decision may be subject to
further appeal. It is unclear what effect this ruling will have on the entities
pursuing open video system operation.
     Although local exchange carriers and cable operators can now expand their
offerings across traditional service boundaries, the general prohibition remains
on local exchange carrier buyouts of co-located cable systems, cable operator
buyouts of co-located local exchange carrier systems, and joint ventures between
cable operators and local exchange carriers in the same market. The 1996 Telecom
Act provides a few limited exceptions to this buyout prohibition, including a
carefully circumscribed "rural exemption". The 1996 Telecom Act also provides