Print Page  Close Window

SEC Filings

S-4/A
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS CAPITAL CORP filed this Form S-4/A on 05/12/1999
Entire Document
 
<PAGE>   98
 
modification or elimination of this compulsory copyright license is the subject
of continuing legislative review and could adversely affect the Company's
ability to obtain desired broadcast programming. The Company cannot predict the
outcome of this legislative activity. Copyright clearances for nonbroadcast
programming services are arranged through private negotiations.
 
     Cable operators distribute locally originated programming and advertising
that use music controlled by the two principal major music performing rights
organizations, the Association of Songwriters, Composers, Artists and Producers
("ASCAP") and Broadcast Music, Inc. ("BMI"). The cable industry and BMI have
reached a standard licensing agreement, and negotiations with ASCAP are ongoing.
Although the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these industry
negotiations or the amount of any license fees it may be required to pay for
past and future use of ASCAP-controlled music, it does not believe such license
fees will be significant to the Company's business and operations.
 
     STATE AND LOCAL REGULATION.  Cable television systems generally are
operated pursuant to nonexclusive franchises granted by a municipality or other
state or local government entity in order to cross public rights-of-way. Federal
law now prohibits LFAs from granting exclusive franchises or from unreasonably
refusing to award additional franchises. Cable franchises generally are granted
for fixed terms and in many cases include monetary penalties for non-compliance
and may be terminable if the franchisee failed to comply with material
provisions.
 
     The specific terms and conditions of franchises vary materially between
jurisdictions. Each franchise generally contains provisions governing cable
operations, service rates, franchising fees, system construction and maintenance
obligations, system channel capacity, design and technical performance, customer
service standards, and indemnification protections. A number of states (such as
Connecticut) subject cable systems to the jurisdiction of centralized state
governmental agencies, some of which impose regulation of a character similar to
that of a public utility. Although LFAs have considerable discretion in
establishing franchise terms, there are certain federal limitations. For
example, LFAs cannot insist on franchise fees exceeding 5% of the system's gross
cable-related revenues, cannot dictate the particular technology used by the
system, and cannot specify video programming other than identifying broad
categories of programming.
 
     Federal law contains renewal procedures designed to protect incumbent
franchisees against arbitrary denials of renewal. Even if a franchise is
renewed, the local franchising authority may seek to impose new and more onerous
requirements such as significant upgrades in facilities and service or increased
franchise fees as a condition of renewal. Similarly, if a local franchising
authority's consent is required for the purchase or sale of a cable system or
franchise, such LFA may attempt to impose more burdensome or onerous franchise
requirements in connection with a request for consent. Historically, most
franchises have been renewed for and consents granted to cable operators that
have provided satisfactory services and have complied with the terms of their
franchise.
 
     Under the 1996 Telecom Act, cable operators are not required to obtain
franchises for the provision of telecommunications services, and LFAs are
prohibited from limiting, restricting, or conditioning the provision of such
services. In addition, LFAs may not require a cable operator to provide any
telecommunications service or facilities, other than institutional networks
under certain circumstances, as a condition of an initial franchise grant, a
franchise renewal, or a franchise transfer. The 1996 Telecom Act also provides
that franchising fees are limited to an operator's cable-related revenues and do
not apply to revenues that a cable operator derives from providing new
telecommunications services.
 
                                       95